Fluoride Harm: Suppressed Science and Silenced Voices

Fluoride Harm: Suppressed Science and Silenced Voices includes 36 chapters from internationally recognized scientists, medical professionals, journalists, and citizen advocates—including Erin Brockovich and Dr. Paul Connett, PhD of the Fluoride Action Network. It covers a range of fluoride issues, including sulfuryl fluoride used as a pesticide in food production.

This book is not intended to be a detailed scientific treatise on fluoride, although scientific evidence of harm and doubts about benefit have been expressed by most of the chapter contributors. Primarily, it is a collection of personal accounts from people who have suffered discrimination, ridicule, and personal attacks because of their advocacy to reveal the harm that fluoride does to people.

Edited by Dr. Hardy Limeback, BSc, PhD, DDS and Karen Favazza Spencer, Fluoride Harm begins with a foreword by Dr. Joseph Ladapo, MD, PhD, the Surgeon General of Florida. This groundbreaking collection of testimonies detailing deceits and politics reveal how fluoride became one of the most controversial and least transparent public health practices in modern history. Each of the contributors to this anthology is well versed on both sides of the fluoride controversy. They oppose the intentional fluoride exposure of the general population without the express consent of the individual.

Some of the authors are fluoride-injured and all of them have paid a price for their commitment to speaking the truth to power. Their personal, multi-year efforts to end the routine poisoning of community water supplies with arsenic-contaminated fluoridation chemicals, chemical byproducts collected from the smokestacks of phosphate fertilizer plants and other industries, have resulted in lost jobs, lost friendships, and lost sleep. But their efforts have helped regain the health of those who have listened and have moved scores of communities as well as two states in the US, so far, to ban water-fluoridation schemes.

Understanding the depth and breadth of the corruption among regulatory, medical, and dental authorities, whose loyalty is for sale, is disheartening. Taking action to prevent your brain, body, and bones from being poisoned for the financial benefit of stakeholders committed to a dental mythology is empowering.

Purchase The Book On Amazon

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest

They Were Children First: The Unanswered Questions of the Casa Pia Mercury Trial

It is easy, after twenty years, to turn Casa Pia into an argument about regulatory classification. That would be a mistake. The people at the center of this story were children. They did not design the study. They did not write the protocol. They did not decide which material would be placed in their teeth. They did not select the investigators. They did not determine which outcomes would be measured. They did not decide which data would be available for analysis. And they did not write the regulatory rules that eventually cited the scientific record generated by their participation. Many were already vulnerable before the study began.

Learn More »

Is the Alzheimer’s Epidemic a Hidden Case of Mercury Poisoning?

In the late 1700s and 1800s, the medical literature of the Western world was remarkably silent regarding the devastating cognitive decline we now call Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). The pathologists of the Victorian era were not mere hobbyists; they were meticulous observers who cataloged rare conditions with obsessive detail.

Learn More »

How a Study Became a Regulatory Benchmark – and Why the Ground Has Shifted

In 2006, FDA staff prepared a White Paper concerning potential adverse health risks associated with mercury in dental amalgam. The agency then brought the issue before a joint advisory panel in September 2006. The panel did not simply endorse the FDA staff’s conclusion. According to the contemporaneous record, the panel voted 13–7 against accepting the FDA staff’s safety conclusion.

Learn More »